Showing posts with label BBFC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BBFC. Show all posts

Monday, 1 June 2020

Industry

IN THIS POST:

  • Spotify Charts 
  • Monetisation & Streaming Revenue Controversy
  • Brexit for artists
  • Coronavirus
  • Women in the music industry
  • Big 3
  • BBFC age ratings
  • Web 2.0
  • Vinyl and cassette revival
  • Monetising brands and merchandise
  • Bauer close regional stations
  • The Tidal and Soundcloud battle
  • Imogen Heap - broken industry?
  • Lana Del Rey tone-deaf comments

SPOTIFY CHARTS 


Spotify, the giant streaming service, has come out with its own list of charts.  They will now be launching weekly top 50 lists for albums and songs.  These include the US Weekly Album Chart, a Global Weekly Album Chart, a US Weekly Song Chart and a Global Weekly Song Chart.  These weekly chart launches are seeing Spotify move into the territory currently occupied by Billboard/MRC, Rolling Stone/Alpha Data and Official Charts, however, these charts are only based on Spotify's numbers and not any other platform.  Spotify is causing disruption as they are digitising the charts by converging it with the streaming service.  Spotify's charts are now globalising non-American media, which is apparent in the Global Weekly Chart.

Billie Eilish came 7th on the Top 10 Artists of 2020 chart and 1st on the Top 10 Female Artists of 2020 chart.


MONETISATION & STREAMING REVENUE CONTROVERSY

ROYALTY CALCULATOR

On this website, you can figure out how much a stream is worth roughly, whether it is on YouTube, Spotify or many others.  Billie Eilish's most streamed song on Spotify is Bad Guy (2019).  It has 1,565,329,342 streams which is equivalent to roughly $6m.

YouTube hasn't openly said how much they pay per stream, however, after some research, this streaming royalty calculator appears to be the most realistic. Billie's most viewed YouTube video, the Bad Guy music video, has over 1 billion views (1,040,721,468).  YouTube's royalties are a lot less than Spotify, so this is equivalent to roughly $2m.

YouTube as a platform,"did not write the song, record the song or create the video.  They did not create the artist's YouTube account of even upload the artist's video to YouTube", so they shouldn't get a cut of the revenue because they weren't responsible for distributing the video.  In order for artists to combat the lack of revenue they earn from YouTube videos, they upload a series of videos, which include lyric videos, fan videos and others.  YouTube is the predominant music steaming service and it's free to upload so artists try to capitalise on this.  A great example of this was Justin Bieber's Yummy.  He uploaded 9 different videos for this one song, being; Yummy (Lyric Video), Yummy (Music Video), Yummy (Fan Lip Sync), Yummy (Beliebers React), Yummy (Animated Video), Yummy (Food Fight)Justin Bieber x drew house: Yummy (Animated Video), Yummy (Summer Walker remix)
and Yummy (TikTok Compilation Video).  The highest viewed video out of these is the music video with 564m views and these videos have around 614m views in total.  This means that Justin Bieber will earn roughly $87.5k more, than if he would have just posted the music video.











TIDAL

Tidal is a Norwegian subscription-based music, podcast and video streaming service.  Tidal was launched in 2014 by Norwegian public company Aspiro and is now owned by Project Panther Bidco (Jay Z).  Tidal is under investigation after accusations of manipulating stream counts and royalty payments.  The accusations were specifically about two albums, Beyoncé's Lemonade and Kanye West's Life of Pablo which in total allegedly added up to more than 320 million fake streams.



 
As recently as early last year, the music industry was just getting on with its thing. Artists, bands and orchestras were performing, touring and recording, while casually adding £2.9bn to the UK economy in 2019, an impressive 9 per cent up on the previous year. The prospect of leaving the European Union was looming but there was talk of a deal and musicians are always flagged up as such an important part of our heritage, envied throughout the world. Surely the politicians negotiating the deal wouldn’t sell us out.

Without visa-free tours of Europe, it will be economically impossible for many artists starting out.  The music industry added £2.9B to the UK economy in 2019.  Whilst the global pandemic brought the music industry to a halt in 2020, the implementation of Brexit on 1st January 2021 has only made the situation worse.  Previously, artists from the UK could tour in 27 other European countries under the same rules as at home, but now it turns out that the UK rejected an offer of visa-free tours by musicians to EU countries.  It's more than just getting a work visa, for tax reasons, every single piece of merchandise will have to be accounted for at every border crossing.

A 'standard' proposal to exempt performers from the huge cost and bureaucracy for 90 days was turned down because the government is insisting on denying that to EU artists visiting this country.  From this month, UK musicians must, like non-EU artists, apply for visas - to visit for more than 30 days - as well as providing proof of savings and a sponsorship certificate from an event organiser.

Bigger artists who can put on stadium shows, like Billie Eilish, will survive, but anyone below that level will struggle to keep their head above the water.  

























If the government withdraws their support, the live music industry could face losing 170,000 jobs.  The live music industry contributed £4.5b to the UK economy in 2019

It found that revenue for the live music sector had plummeted to almost zero since March, while the drop of 81 per cent compared to 2019 is four times the national average.

Live music isn't the only area facing the effects of the Coronavirus, studios are being forced to close as well which caused a halt in the music industry in general.  


For the first time in 89 years, the solid oak doors of Abbey Road Studios have closed. The Beatles made it famous in the 1960s. Kate Bush, Sting, Blur, Radiohead, Amy Winehouse, Adele and Ed Sheeran have all recorded there. But today the studio website informs all comers that: “In line with the strict measures introduced by the UK Government to limit the spread of Covid-19, the Studios are now closed for at least three weeks, with just our security team remaining in place.” And with Abbey Road’s technical wizards all in lockdown, even the studio’s online mixing and mastering services are no longer available.

A lot of artists have found the lockdown difficult but helpful for their creativeness and have written a lot or used the time to figure out how to produce their own music, or record it to send to a producer.  Other people and groups have combatted the situation by having socially distanced rehearsals.  In Canada, the Luminous Voices professional choir bring their cars to an empty parking lot and sing whilst hearing other voices through their car radio. 

Newman's method uses a few simple tools — microphones, a mixer and an FM transmitter.

Music listening has soared during lockdown.  The public rely on music for escapism and entertainment especially through the tough times of a global pandemic.  

More than 155m albums were bought or streamed in 2020, an increase of 8.2%, according to record label body the BPI.

According to the BPI, Billie's album When We All Fall Asleep, Where Do We Go? was the fourth best selling album of 2020.


Dua Lipa, who released the second best album of 2020, Future Nostalgia, believes that women have to work much harder than men and constantly prove themselves to be taken seriously.  

“You’re on a music video and the director goes, ‘I definitely think you need to wear a skirt’ – because someone wants to see, you know, ‘UK’s pop star in a cute outfit’,” Lipa said.

“I’m like, ‘Well, I’m going to wear trousers because it’s f***ing freezing.’ I know how to stand my ground and hold it down.”

In 2014, Kesha sued songwriter/producer Dr Luke for 'sexually, physically and verbally abusing her to the point where she nearly lost her life' which shone a light on the extreme exploitation in the music industry.

The producer countersued her for defamation, denying her claims strenuously. But when a court ruled Kesha had to remain in her contract with Dr Luke earlier this year, the hashtag #FreeKesha began trending on Twitter and fellow female musicians including Lady Gaga, Lily Allen, Kelly Clarkson and Lorde publicly offered her their support, only serving to underline their empathy with her. Taylor Swift donated $250,000 (£198,000) ‘to help with any of her financial needs’, while Adele dedicated her Brit Award for Best Female Solo Artist to her, acknowledging the problems faced by so many female stars by thanking her own record label ‘for embracing the fact that I’m a woman’. The overwhelming outpouring of solidarity for Kesha suggested that her allegations had struck a deep chord with women in the music industry who had up until this point remained tight-lipped. This was confirmed by Lady Gaga, who revealed she had been sexually assaulted by an unnamed producer when she was 19.

Women are representing less than one-third of all performers and 12.5% of songwriters across 800 songs, with women accounting for 2.6% of producers across 500 songs in January 2020.  The Musicians' Union survey showed that almost half of their 31,000 members have faced harassment at work. 

BIG 3

WHO ARE THE BIG 3?

There are 3 major music groups, known as the big 3, which are dominating in the industry currently, Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group.


The Association of Independent Music (AIM) defines a 'major' as "a multinational company which (together with the companies in its group) has more than 5% of the world market(s) for the sale of records or music videos."
In 2014, AIM estimated that the majors had a collective global market share of some 65–70%.

Before 2012, there were 4 major music groups, which included Electronic and Music Industries (EMI).  In 2012 & 2013, the major divisions of EMI were sold off separately.  Most of EMI's recorded music division was absorbed into UMGEMI Music Publishing was absorbed into Sony/ATV Music PublishingEMI's Parlophone and Virgin Classics labels were absorbed into Warner Music Group.

In 2019, Universal Music Group had the US and Canada market share of 54.5%, Sony Music Entertainment had 23.4% and Warner Music Group had 12.1%.    

HOW MUCH DO THEY EARN A DAY?

In 2019, the big 3 music groups made $19m a day from streaming.  In 2018, the big 3 music groups earned a combined total of $6.93b from streaming services, which was $1.6b more than what they earned the year before.  This was the first significant resurgence in the music industry in two decades.

As the influence of streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple Music continues to grow, the domination of physical music sales has been erased in tandem. All three major record companies saw multimillion-dollar declines in sales of physical formats like CDs and cassettes in 2018 — with Sony, which has a suite of artists like Adele who outperform in physical sales, losing as much as a quarter-billion dollars in that category. Vinyl sales continued to be an outlier in the streaming-is-quashing-physical-records narrative, but their numbers were too small to offset the broader physical losses.

WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF THE MUSIC INDUSTRY?

Indie labels are the more minor music groups in the industry.  Although they are often discarded, the indie labels have a combined larger market share than Universal

The indie labels have a combined larger market share as Universal. We don’t have full 2018 numbers yet, but in 2016, the indies had a market share 1.6% higher than Universal. In 2017, that had shrunk to .1%. Still, the independent labels, as a group, are powerful. We tend to forget about them when talking about the Big 3.
Although less common, artists can still become big through being independent or signing to an indie label.  Billie Eilish and her brother Finneas, self-distributed their first song together, Ocean Eyes on the famous streaming platform SoundCloud.  This became a massive hit, and Billie has since signed to one of the big three conglomerates, Universal Music Group's subsidiary, Interscope Records.  Arctic Monkeys had a similar start to their career, with using the internet as their distributor, which helped them gain recognition without the help of a label.

BBFC AGE RATINGS

The BBFC is an independent, private, not-for-profit company which classifies films, video on all physical formats (DVD and Blu-ray Disc for example) and certain video games, advertisements and trailers.  Since 2015, it also classifies, on a best practice voluntary basis, video content for distribution online, like music videos on YouTube and VEVO.  The Big 3 and other UK independent labels have signed up for the BBFC classifications, however only the music videos produced in the UK will be classified, so international artists won't come under the same agreement.  In 2015, out of the 132 videos submitted to the BBFC, 56 were rated 12 and 53 were classified 15. They are under no obligation to submit them to be rated.


With convergence and digitisation making everything accessible with the touch of a few buttons, these ratings are easy to get by, like most things on the internet, but the BBFC aren't trying to hide these videos from children, but make the rating known for parent's, so they can decide whether they will let their child view it.  In 2015, the BBFC published research into public attitudes toward online age rating labels for music videos.  These were the results:
  • 70% of parents of under 12s are concerned about their children being exposed to inappropriate content in music videos.
  • Up to 60% of children say they have seen content in online music videos of which their parents would disapprove.
  • 78% of parents value age ratings for online music videos.
  • Given the choice, 86% of parents would encourage/ensure their children watch online channels with clear age ratings.
  • 75% of parents would like online channels to link music video age ratings to parental controls.
The age ratings were found in the description of the music videos on YouTube, however I can't seem to find them.  The only one that appeared to have a rating was the Dizzee Rascal music video, Couple of Stacks, where you can only watch it if you have a YouTube account which states you're over 18.


Dizzee Rascal - Couple of Stacks The video for Dizzee Rascal's last single was graphic enough to earn an 18 rating. The BBFC cited the video's "strong bloody violence, gore [and] very strong language" in its ruling.

And for fans of music videos, the good news is that the move looks unlikely to curb creativity and fetter artistic freedom. “I don’t think [age rating] in anyway restricts creativity,” argues Hackett. “What is bad about making someone aware that the content of something their child is about to watch might not be appropriate? It allows them to make decisions as a parent, giving the viewing public more information.”


LOOPS MEDIA'S RESEARCH


WEB 2.0


Web 2.0 is a modern theory derived from theorist Tim O'Reilly. This theory suggests producers create the context, but the audience is becoming increasingly involved. There are several websites, caused by convergence, that can generate information released by audience. The websites that are clear examples of web 2.0 are:
  • Wikipedia
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
Wikipedia allows the audience to create information on many different topics and people. Facebook is becoming more popular than news channels or platforms. This is both an issue and a positive. It means your don't have one biased source, however it also means you can be negatively influenced from influential figures (two-step flow).

In specific reference to the music industry, the artist releases the music (in audio format or video format), and the audience take ahold of this, and create their own content surrounding this. This is proposed to generate as much attention to the artists music as their released music. Examples of different fan contributed videos are:
  • Lyric videos
  • Animated recreations
  • Artist compilations and fan edits
  • Covers
  • Reaction videos
  • Other platform videos (TikTok videos)
  • Video remakes
  • Remixes
  • Dance videos
In recent years, artists have been releasing their own various versions of video to create more attention around songs, which include:
  • Song teasers
  • Album teasers
  • Fan compilations
  • Several remixes
  • Dance videos
  • and more
This is a video that clearly denotes Billie Eilish's fan contributions.


VINYL AND CASSETTE REVIVAL

To cover the recent revival of both of the physical formats of media, it is important to address their history and years of popularity. Vinyl discs were popular throughout the 1900s, first rising to popularity in the 30s and 40s. Despite rising to popularity, they were originally a commercial 'flop', as consumers were hesitant during the great depression, and with a lack of playback equipment. Columbia Records and RCA Victor were dominating the industry for decades, fighting for control over the industry for years, known as the 'War of the Speeds'. On the right is a graph denoting music revenue from 1977 to 2017. Vinyl were clearly dominating before this time period as well. Vinyl sales peaked between 1977 and 1980, receiving just under $16b in revenue. After this period, it began to drop off with the introduction of competitors, with the key being cassette tapes

Audiocassettes were introduced for home use in the 1960s, however were unsuccessful in comparison to Vinyl's dominance. In 1966, the first music albums released on the cassette format, with the first artists being Nina Simone, Earths Kitt and Johnny Mathis. In the mid 1970s, cassette decks were introduced to cars, replacing the previous 8 track players. This boosted their popularity, and in the 1980's, Cassette tapes began to dominate the industry. Another key reason being Sony's release of Walkman (a portable music player that revolutionised the way that people consumed music on the go.
As seen in the graph, Both Vinyl and Cassettes lost their popularity when CD's started to become more accessible due to their digitised format. With around 15 years of disappearance, both formats began to make a slow comeback, with Vinyl's being slightly more distinct. In this graph, you can see the comeback of vinyls in the US. In 2006, there were 0.9m unit sales. After 15 years of steady growth, it has risen to 18.8m unit sales. A large proportion of these purchases are back catalogue. In the UK in 2019, 7 out of the top 10 purchased worldwide vinyl discs were back catalogueBack catalogue is a musical performer's music which they recorded and released in the past rather than their latest recordings. This shows that a large proportion of vinyl sales are not necessarily bought to listen to a new release, but bought for nostalgic reasons. Below are the top 10 best sold albums.
Although cassettes have not had the same rise in popularity, there has still been a small bump, as present in the first graph. The popularity is solely due to fashion, with modern artists often selling them as merchandise, as opposed to selling them as a genuine popular format to listen to their music. But beyond the novelty factor, there is something seductive about the format. The cassette has a tactile and intimate element to it compared with the corporate magic of streaming millions of songs. Cassettes give every album an overture of clunk and rattle as they settle into the player, and they confer a strange, transgressive mastery on the listener. If you decide you don’t like the music, you can just record over it with something better. Cassettes bring artists back down to earth by reminding them that art, like life, is fragile and fleeting. (SOURCE)

MONETISING BRANDS AND MERCHANDISE


Because of digitisation, artists have the opportunity to monetise many new things, often including unusual merchandise, various music formats and different products. A large proportion of the 'strange' yet popular merchandise come from the specific genre of metal. One key example is Marilyn Manson, as they released their own Absinth in 2007. Despite this being an unusual product, it fits well with his subcultured audience.

In the rock and metal genres, alcohol (specifically beer) is quite popular. In 1983, iron maiden released their own beer, named after that years single 'Trooper', and even set up a whole website for this product.

Here is a powerpoint on some of the more rare items of merchandise...


BAUER CLOSE REGIONAL STATIONS


LINK

Outlets across England and Wales owned by Bauer Media – ranging from Wolverhampton’s Signal 107 to York’s Minster FM and Salisbury’s Spire FM – will now broadcast under the single brand Greatest Hits Radio. 

In August of 2020, Bauer (a UK-based radio division) shut down many local, regional radio stations, in an attempt to bring in more listeners, advertisement and revenue through forming a large, national station named 'Greatest Hits Radio'. It will follow a slighter more nostalgic root than most other popular radio stations across the UK, in an attempt to attract a wide audience. Many critics are 'outraged' by this decision.

“This is an act of breathtaking cultural vandalism from a company which has been busily acquiring local stations unchecked by regulators or government,” said the former Labour MP John Grogan, who campaigned on the issue while in parliament. “Many of these local radio stations are heavily involved in community activities and provide news bulletins to a young audience which other outlets find it hard to reach.”

John Grogan feels it is an act of vandalism, as stripping local towns and cities from local radio stations will have a negative affect. Yorkshire Coast radio revolves around updating the town on life in Yorkshire, creating relatable content, creating the sense of relatability, with call-ins being very common on the show. Workers at these local stations will lose their work. 

“The presenters live and work on the coast, people can ring in and they feel like friends to the listeners. During Covid, several people have said to me it’s a lifeline. If people wanted to listen to a national station they’d just put Radio 1 or 2 on but Bauer didn’t seem interested in listening figures.”

It is clear that the audience attempting to be reached my 'Greatest Hits Radio' is similar to the wide audience of local stations, however it loses its sense of relatability. It bares the question, where does this leave local stations. Radio is becoming increasingly digitised, with Beats Radio being a clear example, however that is less likely to be accessed by the older audience. Much like all media industries, the industry is less likely to perform as well without the competing indie companies, with a monopolised industry restricting the audience to the content available. Bauer are likely to make more revenue from creating a larger scale station, but not without upsetting many villages in the process.

The most recent Rajar audience figures show Yorkshire Coast Radio was listened to by 43% of the local population every week and a large number of local advertisers, but with just 113,000 adults in its catchment area, the potential for big profits was always going to be limited.

THE TIDAL AND SOUNDCLOUD BATTLE


LINK

Both Tidal and Soundcloud are popular music streaming platforms. Tidal, best known for being owned by Jay-Z, was formed in 2014. Soundcloud, best known for being the 'start up' website for many music artists, was formed in 2007. In recent years, Tidal and Soundcloud have been on a very similar level, with Tidal's 2019 revenue being $166.9m. This was a 13% rise from the year before, however 2018 saw a 26% rise from the year before. With Tidal's revenue slowly in progress, it meant Soundcloud could accelerate their revenue, catching up heavy ground to Tidal in 2019, with their revenue being $166m. This was a 37% increase from the year before. The year prior to this (2018), Tidal were $20m ahead. 

SoundCloud’s operating losses in 2019 were significantly smaller than TIDAL’s – in fact, around half the size – at $26.7m.

Overall, Soundcloud's 2019 was ultimately significantly more progressive than Tidal's, as they ended with a much higher profit, due to their losses being half of Tidal's. Although 2020 figures are yet to have been releases, it is a safe bet to assume that Tidal have fallen behind Soundcloud.

UPDATE:

Soundcloud have released 2020 annual revenue, exceeding $200m for the first time. (source)




IMOGEN HEAP - BROKEN INDUSTRY?


LINK

I couldn’t live with myself if I continued to work in an industry that was hostile for music makers, so I came up with a solution to end the woes of artists around the world


Imogen Heap, a popular musician, most famous for 'Hide & Seek', is an electronic/dance music artist, from Essex. She has recently released a statement on the treatment of artists in the music industry, arising her own solution from this. Here proposal is this:

I’ve been talking about, writing about, soliciting feedback about and pouring any spare cash I have into what I feel is the solution to all of these woes. I call it “The Creative Passport”.

The Creative Passport is a verified digital ID for music makers, allowing them to update, manage and control all information about themselves and their works from one place. No more multiple profiles to keep updated, and passwords to remember; and no more identity scams and verification due diligence for music services. A new music services digital marketplace can thrive, bringing fresh income streams to music creators and the music ecosystem.

Musicians are becoming extremely unhappy with the large control over the music industry, stating the record label controls everything, including revenuesocial image and distribution. This leaves the artists isolated amongst millions of different opinions and press statements. The lack of input from artists is harming their image, and overall, creating an industry that surrounds the wrong expectations from society. The 'creative password' is proposed to give artists the option of presenting their own image in the way they intend to. She emailed every artist she had every worked with, optimistically asking them to believe her website and prospect.

LANA DEL REY TONE-DEAF COMMENTS?


LINK

She wrote in part: “Now that Doja Cat, Ariana [Grande], Camila [Cabello], Cardi B, Kehlani and Nicki Minaj and Beyoncé have had number ones with songs about being sexy, wearing no clothes, f***ing, cheating etc – can I please go back to singing about being embodied, feeling beautiful by being in love even if the relationship is not perfect, or dancing for money – or whatever I want – without being crucified or saying that I’m glamourising abuse??????”

On InstagramLana Del Rey released this statement, in hopes of clearing herself from all the hate she had been receiving over her harsh representations in her music videos. In the process, she ended up receiving more negative comments than positive, with a lot of other 'influencers' disagreeing with her opinion. Model, Tess Holiday, said, "I'm disappointed", while general comments included throwing around the 'tone-deaf'. Other comments believe there was an aspect of racism in this comment, with one comment stating:

“The women you mentioned are all but one women of colour, black and brown women are not the reason for the negative criticism in the music industry,” someone else commented in part.

“The success of those women have NOTHING to do with you... they’re not even in the same genre as you, why even mention them?”

Another comment:

“Come on, you should know better. You could’ve gotten your entire point across without dragging those other women by name. Be mad at the game not the other players. Disappointing.”

Although I feel Lana Del Rey should be allowed to create her music videos, as they have a strong yet impactful effect on educating her fans, I agree with this last statement. Her 'calling out' these other artists seems as though it is an unnecessary attempt to cause to attention.

Overall, this comment was Lana's attempt to repair her image, and for the internet to fully understand her vision when creating her abstract videos, however caused backlash, leaving her comments section with more preconceived opinions.


Responding on Instagram, Del Rey said: "Don't ever ever ever call me racist."

She added: "The singers I mentioned are my favourite singers so if you want to try and make a bone to pick out of that, like you always do be my guest.

"It doesn't change the fact that I haven't had the same opportunity to express what I wanted to express without being completely decimated.

"If you want to say that that has something to do with race that's your opinion but that's not what I was saying."

Audience

 IN THIS POST:

  • Our Audience: Conclusion
  • Audience research: survey
  • Billie Eilish social media comments
  • Online research and opinions
  • Web 2.0: Audience engagement
  • Live concert audience
  • BBFC
OUR AUDIENCE: CONCLUSION

PRIMARY
  • Age: 13-24
  • Gender: Female
  • Economic grouping: BC1C2
  • Sexuality: Heterosexual
SECONDARY
  • Age: 16-24
  • Gender: Male
  • Economic grouping: BC1C2
  • Sexuality: Heterosexual

AUDIENCE RESEARCH: SURVEY


We created an audience survey to delve into the target age and gender for the electropop/dark-pop genre.  The survey came along with a video to watch first:





SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENT SECTIONS


 



 


 



ONLINE RESEARCH AND OPINIONS


UNRAVELING THE RISE OF BILLIE EILISH

This article identifies the similarities between Billie's audience, Khalid's audience and the audience of 13 Reasons Why. It explores Billie's 'blow up', identifying a core reason as her song 'Bored' appearing in the series '13 Reasons Why'. Another reason being her audience similarities with Khalid. All three explore 'teen' issues, including struggles with mental health and relationships. 13 Reasons Why explores a character named Hannah Baker, and explores her suicide voice recordings. Some of Billie's 'bored' lyrics include:

The games you played were never fun
You'd say you'd stay but then you'd run
Giving you what you're begging for
Giving you what you say I need
I don't want any settled scores
I just want you to set me free
Giving you what you're begging...

These lyrics started her career into the 'dark pop' genre, with the beat contrasting with the lyrics and tone of the song. 

Billie secured another major placement, as her song “Bored” was featured in the popular Netflix series, 13 Reasons Why, on March 31st 2017. 13 Reasons Why is, perhaps, a perfect sync for Billie as the demographic of the audience and nature of the show corresponds excellently with her audience and lyrical themes. 

Khalid is another artist that fits beautifully with the themes and audience of the show, as well as Billie’s own audience (he was featured in Logic’s hit song, “1–800–273–8255,” about suicide). He has a similar aged and gendered fanbase, is another teen artist, and sings about similar topics in his own unique manner. Below are the demographics of Khalid’s Instagram following…eerily similar to Billie’s shown above. This collaboration, both with Khalid and 13 Reasons Why, epitomizes the incredible results when one finds the right partnership.

This article also provides charts on Billie's demographic, taken from her Instagram following.

In terms of demographic of the audience, according to Nielsen, the show’s audience skews 65% female and 35% male. Furthermore, about 75% of the viewers of the show are 34 years old or younger. Additionally, the show revolves around a teen suicide — fitting for Billie’s lyrical themes (to be discussed). This fit is absolutely critical — Billie didn’t get just any sync placement but one that fits perfectly with her audience. As noted below, Billie’s Instagram following is mostly female and between 13 and 24 years old, beautifully matching the demographic of 13 Reasons Why’s audience.

The majority of her Instagram audience is female, aged 18-24, while the general gender split is 69.7% female, and 30.3% male. The following most popular age group is 13-17, with (at the time of the article being published) Billie being aged at 16-17. I expected the primary audience on Instagram to be the 13-17 age group, as the Uses and Gratification theory suggests her popularity with that age group largely comes from identification

As her music and audience has progressed, her career paths have matured, with her most recent song being 'No Time To Die'. This song is featured in the upcoming James Bond film. The progression to go from a suicide teen romance Netflix series to one of the film industries most popular film franchises is a clear attempt to expand her target audience, opting to bring in the 25-34 and 35-44 audiences. James Bond is also more popular amongst a male audience, with the genre (Spy/Action) being more appealing to men. 

Although the streaming site does not release viewing figures for its shows, TV ratings company Nielsen estimates that more than six million US viewers saw the first episode of 13 Reasons Why's new series in the three days after its release, compared to fewer than three million for The Crown's season two debut. (source)

Latest. The season 2 premiere episode of “13 Reasons Why,” Netflix's controversial teen-suicide drama series, averaged 6.08 million viewers in the U.S. in the first three days of its release, according to Nielsen estimates. (source)


(source)

     
 This is a comparison between the
      viewership of 13 Reasons Why and 
      James Bond. In 13 Reasons Why's first 2
      series (most popular series), they 
      accumulated just over 12 million viewers
      on Netflix. In James Bond's 2 most recent 
      films (No Time To Die yet to be released),
      it accumulated around a $2b in Box 
      Office. This is a clear step up, as Billie 
      Eilish has increased her audience
      becoming more global and reaching a 
      wider audience.














There are already well-established stereotypical traits attributed to Billie Eilish fans. Essentially, many believe that those who frequently document their love for the artist reflect the majority of her following. Sure, the most vocal of her fans tend to imitate – or share – her fashion style; after all, the performer is regularly regarded as a modern fashion icon and role model for younger listeners. Fanbases which appear particularly active and outspoken can be pretty irritable and obnoxious sometimes, but the danger here is that Eilish’s fanbase may prevent older listeners from consuming her music.
This article explores the audience her debut album, WHEN WE ALL FALL ASLEEP WHERE DO WE GO, received, as well as her authenticity as an artist. Similar to Lady Gaga, Billie Eilish has formed a very loyal and dedicated fan base, with many of the young females posting their love for her on different social media platforms. She has a strong influence over her fans, releasing her mercy/clothing line, creating her own art of subculture (largely evolving around the colour green/darker colours, taking in a mix of the pop subculture and the goth subculture). 


The question is raised as to whether these 'obsessive' young fans have a negative impact on Billie's attempt to appeal to a wider audience. Considered 'irritable' and 'obnoxious', this excessive social media presence can put off a potential older audience.

Generally, her fans are largely believed to be teenage girls, and of course, that’s clearly the target demographic. The artist is still quite 

young herself, and it’s refreshing to see that this target audience has someone like Eilish as a role model – she’s ambitious and hardly the figure of controversy that many young pop stars conform to. The primary issue is that such strong associations with youth culture may alienate older audiences, when in fact, her music may appeal to older audiences who instead just avoid her product under the belief that it’s not for them. 

Her tendency to create relatable content for her audience to identify is seen to alienate the older audiences, despite the fact that her music differs from 'generic' pop. Here is a clear example of an older man firmly against Billie Eilish's music and 'movement'. 


Quotes include:
  • "This trash emo drug addict"
  • "I understand it's a different generation of morons that like this emo garbage"
  • "If you guys are fans of that horrible horrible music, then that's fine. You've got to take the L though. You know that music is trash"

Her debut album is actually a pretty accessible and interesting record, boasting some alluring material. It’s a shame to think that many older audiences have already shrugged it off because they think it’s for teenagers. This attitude will affect Eilish in the long run, as she’s already established that she wants to grow as an artist. Sometimes, in these cases, the fanbase doesn’t grow with you; they may just latch onto the next trend when it comes. Yet, Eilish clearly strives to be much more than a passing trend. It’s an impressive debut of wide appeal, but as things stand, it’s unlikely to reach as wide an audience as it perhaps should.

BRAND AUTHENTICITY: BILLIE EILISH'S MASTERCLASS IN TALKING TO GEN Z AUDIENCES


This article highlights her approachability and relatability. It covers her instagram posts, comments and style of language, emphasising her similarities to 'normal' teenage social medias. After winning 5 grammy's, she captioned her photo (of her holding the awards) with, "5 ARE YOU KIDDING ME". This unprofessional style of caption is highly relatable, as it is clear that she shares the shock and excitement with her young fanbase. This means that when her audience read this, they engage with the post, often liking, commenting or sharing the post. Her language matches the normal 16 year old teenagers language, and this image of Billie Eilish is created to connect with these fans. 

In her captions, Eilish shows her fanbase she’s just another girl on the internet, fluent in internet-speak. Dragged out words like “NOWWWWW” and the slightly hysterical tone in “FIVE ARE YOU KIDDING” mimic speech, it is as if Eilish is talking not writing. 

In others, she writes in lower-case entirely - vague phrases like “been gone” or “careful who ya talkin to” that come across as fragments of thought.


These captions sit well on Eilish’s instagram page, but would easily fit in as some 16 year old teenager’s snapchat caption, or as tweets on any young person’s twitter feed. 


The article draws the similarities/differences between social media platforms, comparing Billie Eilish to Ariana Grande. Ariana Grande follows a theme (monochrome) on her instagram, whereas Billie Eilish posts random pictures, with no filters and no specific captions. It appears that, as she is a young celebrity, she is in charge of her social media (continuing the identification theory), whereas Ariana Grande's social media is controlled by her record label.

Examining results from our image semiotics model, no clear clustering was found for Eilish’s instagram pictures. Unlike most pop stars who cycle through various “themes” for their instagram - for example, Ariana Grande’s mostly monochrome feed with occasional glam selfie shots, Eilish’s profile has everything from media shots of her to shots of her leaning against an abandoned mattress in a street alley. A lot more real. And way more approachable.

Screengrabs of her music video/advertising collateral are followed promptly by a post showing her slumped down in a seat, with a Rick and Morty backpack. A picture of tour dates is preceded by a shot of Eilish leaning against the railings, in baggy ordinary-looking clothes and messy hair.

Eilish’s instagram aesthetic ranges from celebrity-like content such as magazine covers and paparazzi pictures to the homemade and common, showing her audience that she knows she’s not exactly a regular person with a regular life, but yet is relatable.

WHAT IS BILLIE'S CONCERT DEMOGRAPHIC LIKE? AGE AND GENDER?


This link takes you to a reddit page, with the question being posed to the sites users. Generally, reddit have a slightly older audience in comparison to most social medias, therefore some of these opinions might be negative, reinforcing the opinion shared in the earlier article, stating older audiences are put off by the 'obsessive' fans. Here are some of the responses:

"10-20ish year old girls and gay boys. A LOT of younger teens who are vicious and will do anything to see her or get closer etc. and mom’s who will encourage their kids to do so. But I highly recommend even with the kinda shitty fans. Billie is an amazing performer"

"i think its probably 12-16 year old girls. thats my personal experience though.
it also seems to be the main demographic that attends her concerts."


"I'm glad I'm not the only one wondering.. I'm 24 and my roommate is 27 and we really wanna go.. but volunteering myself to be around 16 yo girls and boys with their parents goes against everything I believe in LOL"

"No one older than 25 unless its a parent. I’d say there was 1 boy every 7 girls."

All of these examples seem to be fans of Billie Eilish and her music, however are overshadowed and put off by her younger audience. This suggests that her secondary audience could be the same that was suggested through an analysis of her instagram demographic, being 25-34. This may not be the type of fan to buy merchandise, or attend shows (pushing into the front row), however sit back and enjoy her music.

WEB 2.0: AUDIENCE ENGAGEMENT




LIVE CONCERT AUDIENCE


I have put together this powerpoint to identify the leading audience to attend a Billie Eilish concert. It is clear that there is a certain demographic that attend her shows. Young females (and occasionally males) at the front. Towards the back, you have the secondary audience, with less desire to scream her music, and more desire to hear her sing. This information gives us detail over her most dedicated fans, meaning we will adapt our products to fit the appeal.

 


AUDIENCE MEMBERS MOODBOARD

I have put together two different moodboards on what our target audience would wear, watch and listen to.  I have made one for males and one for females.

MALE


FEMALE


BBFC

We had to take into consideration the BBFC.  Technically, Billie Eilish isn't from the UK, so her videos wouldn't come under this agreement.  However, we still wanted to abide by their regulations for our video.  Our video isn't explicit in any way, but it is a bit risqué, so parents may want a rating on this video.  I think the BBFC may rate this a 12 or less, so it wouldn't affect our target audience.